Content deleted Content added
→Round 1: replies and discussion |
|||
Line 26:
:CSD for unremarkable person is the right tag {{=)|smile}}. I wouldn't use CSD for nonsense here, because [[WP:CSD]] says it's just for: "Pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history." The article isn't gibberish, it's a sentence that makes sense - it's just not remarkable enough for a wikipedia article {{=)|wink}}. Can you see the difference?
:I can see the difference.
::Cool. Speedy quiz: which csd would you use for articles that just say:
::1. Janet Jackson is the most nicest girl at my school ever.
::2. Janet Jafeihon grafigledfg jobidlee.
::3. Janet Jackson is
::4. Janet Jackson stinks and everyone hates her.
2. [[User:Physics is all gnomes/NPP tutorial/Haplostachys haplostachya|Haplostachys haplostachya]]
Line 36 ⟶ 40:
:I agree it's a good article. Why do you think the username should be reported?
::No, not really needed for the username to be reported
:::Yeah, the username looks alright to me.
Line 45 ⟶ 50:
:Have a closer look at this one. Do you think the topic meets the [[WP:N|notability guidelines]]?
::I just cannot find the right part of the [[WP:Criteria for speedy deletion|Criteria for speedy deletion]] for it.
:::What could you use if you think it should be deleted but it doesn't meet any CSD criteria?
Line 57 ⟶ 63:
:As you noticed, it's an unreferenced BLP. As unreferenced BLPs are ''very bad things'' there is the [[WP:BLPPROD]] tag, also known as the sticky prod, for all BLPS created after March 2010 with no references. Have you used it before? That's what I would use here. What do you think?
::I never used it before but I think that that page should have it.
:::Ok great. Have a read of [[WP:BLPPROD]]. Ask me if there's anything there that's confusing. Here's a quiz about biographies of living people:
:::# A new BLP looks notable but has no references. What should you do?
:::# A new BLP has a couple of references but could use more. What should you do?
:::# Can the article's creator ever remove the BLPPROD?
:::# You come across a BLP that was created in 2008, but still has no references. You look everywhere for some, but can't find any. It seems the person might not be notable. What should you do?
:::# A new BLP is about a minor politician. It says that he's a crook, had an affair with a 19 year old girl and got arrested for dealing drugs when he was younger. It has no references. What should you do?
:::# Why is it important that BLPs should be referenced, anyway?
5. [[User:Physics is all gnomes/NPP tutorial/Ghjk|Ghjk]]
Line 67 ⟶ 79:
:Yep, total nonsense {{=)|grin}}. It's a bit of a waste of your time to tag for uncategorized and unreferenced here, as this one will definitely get deleted.
::Yeah, but just to show if it shouldn't be deleted, what tags would I put.
:::Ah I see, that's fine then.
Line 88 ⟶ 101:
:I think this is one of these cases where it's better to be cautious. A7 is not for articles "that make any credible claim of significance or importance". The article claims he "had big success all over the world as the front figure of the Hip Hop duo, QWAN... signed a world-wide deal with Euteria Management Group." Maybe he's notable, maybe he's not, but it sounds like a claim of significance. The problem with CSDing is that the article will be gone before the creator has a chance to improve the references. After you've tried looking for reliable sources yourself, maybe this could be [[WP:PROD]]ed with a message "This article needs references to reliable, independent sources to show that Marino meets [[WP:ARTIST]]"? That way if the creator comes back he has some helpful information about how to improve it.
::Good.
:::Cool. In your opinion, what are the advantages of PROD? What are the disadvantages?
| |||