Content deleted Content added
→Round 1: reply to first few comments |
→Round 1: more replies |
||
Line 67:
:::Ok great. Have a read of [[WP:BLPPROD]]. Ask me if there's anything there that's confusing. Here's a quiz about biographies of living people:
:::# A new BLP looks notable but has no references. What should you do? Add the unreferenced BLP, and or PROD.
:::#:Okay, but [[WP:BLPPROD]] would be better than [[WP:PROD]] here, because BLPPRODs are "sticky": they can only be removed once someone adds a reliable source.
:::# A new BLP has a couple of references but could use more. What should you do? Add refimprove BLP
:::#:Yep I agree.
:::# Can the article's creator ever remove the BLPPROD? No, it must be by an other user.
:::#:I don't agree. As far as I understand it, anyone can remove the BLPPROD, including the article's creator, as long as they add at least one reliable source. See [[Wikipedia:BLPPROD#Objecting]].
:::# You come across a BLP that was created in 2008, but still has no references. You look everywhere for some, but can't find any. It seems the person might not be notable. What should you do? Speedy deletion requested, and custom reason of speedy deletion.
:::#:Possibly, but most articles that have survived that long don't meet any of the CSD criteria. In that case, AfD is probably best.
:::# A new BLP is about a minor politician. It says that he's a crook, had an affair with a 19 year old girl and got arrested for dealing drugs when he was younger. It has no references. What should you do? Attack page speedy deletion.
:::#:I agree.
:::# Why is it important that BLPs should be referenced, anyway? So that the subject (remember that it is living) is okay with what is there, and better accuracy.
:::#:Roughly speaking, yes.
5. [[User:Physics is all gnomes/NPP tutorial/Ghjk|Ghjk]]
| |||