Content deleted Content added
→Challenge: Prod quiz |
|||
Line 227:
An article by a new contributor, with one source, about a hockey player who doesn't seem to be notable (but claims enough significance to avoid A7).
{{Tlsp|Proposed deletion|2=concern=''nn hockey player''}}
An article about a minor Harry Potter character.
{{Tlsp|Proposed deletion|2=concern=''We have too many articles about Harry Potter characters.''}}
A boy-band who won 7th place in a TV talent show but haven't released any albums.
{{Tlsp|Proposed deletion|2=concern=''No evidence of notability per [[WP:MUSIC]].''}}
An article with no references about a new steel-making technology called Expatial which has been developed by a company called Extreme Performance Alloys, Inc.
{{Tlsp|Proposed deletion|2=concern=''This appears to be a non-notable neologism and fails [[WP:NEO]]. I find no relevant matches in GBooks or GNews archives. If this were an accepted industry term then I would expect some technical publications with ISBNs to use it.}}
An article about a radio presenter that's poorly written, has a few reliable sources, but has a "Childhood" section that's unreferenced.
{{Tlsp|Proposed deletion|2=concern=''Poorly written, needs more references.''}}
| |||