Content deleted Content added
Line 236:
:No, but it could be in AfD.
::Why do you think this should be AfD rather than PROD? (I'm not saying you're wrong, just want to understand your reasoning.)
:::Well AfD is almost the same thing (it is an article) but its for the notability.
An article about a minor Harry Potter character.
Line 248 ⟶ 249:
:No, but AfD might be good for notability.
::Why do you think this should be AfD rather than PROD? (Again, I'm not saying you're wrong, just want to understand your reasoning.)
:::See above to the hockey player
An article with no references about a new steel-making technology called Expatial which has been developed by a company called Extreme Performance Alloys, Inc.
Line 262 ⟶ 263:
:Yes, it could be PROD for that concerns.
::Just to be clear, the article does have enough reliable references to show it's notable, but it has these big problems with writing style and the unreferenced childhood section. Do you still think that this PROD reason is good?
:::It is not for the references, but for the writing problems.
Sorry, I wrote three questions at once and can't work out which ones you're saying yes/no to. Could you make your answers more detailed please?
| |||