Revision as of 14:11, 17 January 2011 edit FluffySquid (talk \| contribs) 15 edits m →Is this the best way of doing this?: fix ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:40, 18 April 2011 edit undo Jk2q3jrklse (talk \| contribs) 5,068 edits →Two example implementations: new section Next edit →
Line 144: The Gang of Four have an interaction diagram that shows that you get the resulting product from the builder. I can't see any reason why you would need a setPizzaBuilder setter - you would just pass the pizzaBuilder in as a parameter. This leads to cleaner code, IMO. - [[User:FluffySquid\|FluffySquid]] ([[User talk:FluffySquid\|talk]]) 14:11, 17 January 2011 (UTC) == Two example implementations == I'm not sure we need two example implementations. C++ and Java are not radically different in syntax, and there's nothing about the pattern that can't be covered in one. — [[User:Anndelion\|<font color="#6B8E23">'''anndelion'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Anndelion\|<span style="font-size:125%; vertical-align:text-middle; color:#DAA520"><span class="Unicode">❋</span></span>]] 21:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Builder pattern: Difference between revisions