Revision as of 06:45, 20 April 2011 edit Rajpaj (talk \| contribs) 417 edits →Is this generic? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:42, 23 April 2011 edit undo Rajpaj (talk \| contribs) 417 edits →Disambiguation: new section Next edit →
Line 67: It seems that [[Red Hat]] was the first to implement KVM, but does that make it proprietary? The way the article was written implies that it is simply a framework, and any kernel can be used to mimic a machine in virtual space.[[User:Rajpaj\|Rajpaj]] ([[User talk:Rajpaj\|talk]]) 06:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC) == Disambiguation == I propose a disambiguatio page for this article. My main reason for such a request is that KVM is in reality, a generic forecast. This article specifies only the Linux version.

Talk:Kernel-based Virtual Machine: Difference between revisions