Content deleted Content added
Tryptofish (talk | contribs) →Merger possibilities: reply |
Thomea neuro (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 35:
'''Argument against a merger with [[Sparse coding]]''': sparse coding and its derivatives (unsupervised learning of sparse representations) have become important in [[Machine learning|machine learning]], outside of the context of neural coding and the associated biological analogies. Examples of papers in that area include (Teh, Welling, Hinton & Osindero 2003, JMLR), (Lee, Battle, Raina & Ng, NIPS'2006), (Ranzato, Poultney & LeCun, NIPS'2006), (Elard & Aharon 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Proc.), (Ranzato, Boureau & LeCun, NIPS'2007), (Grosse, Raina, Kwong & Ng, UAI 2007), (Kavukcuoglu, Ranzato & LeCun 2008, tech. rep.), (Lee, Ekanadham & Ng, NIPS 2007), (Bradley & Bagnell, NIPS'2008), David Bradley's PhD thesis (2009).{{unsigned2|00:48, 26 March 2011|Yoshua.Bengio}}
:Hmmm... In its present form, [[sparse coding]] says nothing about that. Perhaps a spinout article dealing with the machine aspects would be the way to go? --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 18:47, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
: I've got to agree with Tryptofish on this one, perhaps there can be a disambiguation page for the various "codings", since this problem will come up beyond the [[sparse coding]] issue.--[[User:Thomea neuro|Thomea neuro]] ([[User talk:Thomea neuro|talk]]) 16:52, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
== Removing new NeuroElectroDynamics section ==
| |||