Revision as of 15:05, 5 May 2010 edit Mike Linksvayer (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,710 edits m →ACAP and search engines ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:14, 8 May 2011 edit undo 118.208.55.180 (talk) →Comment and debate: add See Also section with link to Sitemaps Next edit →
Line 22: ==Comment and debate== The project has generated considerable online debate, in the search<ref>[http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/060922-104102 Search Engine Watch article]</ref>, content<ref>[http://shore.com/commentary/newsanal/items/2006/200601002publishdrm.html Shore.com article about ACAP]</ref> and intellectual property<ref>[http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=408&res=1280_ff&print=0 IP Watch article about ACAP]</ref> communities. If there are linking themes to the commentary, they are that keeping the specification simple will be critical to its successful implementation, and that the aims of the project are focussed on the needs of publishers, rather than readers. Many have seen this as a flaw.<ref name="douglas"/><ref>[http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/ian_douglas/blog/2008/01/23/acap_shoots_back Acap shoots back]</ref> == See Also == * [[Sitemaps]] ==References==

Automated Content Access Protocol: Difference between revisions