Wikipedia:School and university projects/Piotrus course intro boilerplate: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 110:
* Also, revisit your first edits. Have they been retained? Have they been improved by others? Post a report on your userpage, and notify the instructor for another {{fontcolor|green|extra credit}} point (1P). If you improve the edit yourself and discuss it with other editors that might have disagreed with it previously, you may receive another {{fontcolor|green|extra credit}} point (1P).
* '''Informal Reviews'''. Before Saturday, June 5, each of your members should look at an article being developed by others, review it on that article's talk page, and write a summary for your own group (on your own article's talk page) saying whether anything that group has done is valuable for you. You should try to review different articles if possible. '''Finishing this assignment on time is worth 5% of the course grade.'''
* '''''[[Wikipedia:GAN|Good article nomination]]'''''. Before Monday, June
:*'''''This means your article should be mostly finished by then! But it doesn't mean your work is done, FAR FROM IT! You are responsible for keeping daily track of comments by reviewers (which will include the instructor), answering them and addressing them (if they are reasonable, when in doubt, ask the instructor).''''' Here are some sample Good Article reviews and related discussions: [[Talk:United States Senate Select Committee on Improper Activities in Labor and Management/GA1|example1]], [[Talk:Mount Kenya/GA1|example2]], [[Talk:Gaza/GA1|exampe3]]. '''Finishing this assignment on time AND subsequent interaction with Good Article reviewer is worth 5% of the course grade.'''
* Course instructor (Piotr Konieczny) <'''replace with your name'''> will do the final assessment of your work after Monday, June
Note: total amount of {{fontcolor|green|extra credit}} you can get from the activities listed above is 15 (15%). Extra credit is added, unweighted, to your final course score.
| |||