Revision as of 04:35, 24 May 2011 edit WhatamIdoing (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 128,589 edits →Things to think about: 2¢ ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:00, 30 May 2011 edit undo Dmcq (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 29,599 edits →Notability: new section Next edit →
Line 9: ::I think that we need to address secondary-for-notability directly, because the odd, non-standard definition in play at AFD is where most editors get their first training on what a secondary source is. Then they wander out to the rest of the encyclopedia and get completely confused and often upset when someone points out that yesterday's 'eyewitness news' story actually isn't a secondary source. [[User:WhatamIdoing\|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing\|talk]]) 04:35, 24 May 2011 (UTC) == Notability == The major use of secondary sources in Wikipedia is to show something has been noticed. As it is currently written a yellow pages directory of companies would be considered a secondary source, do we really want to consider that as source of notability? [[User:Dmcq\|Dmcq]] ([[User talk:Dmcq\|talk]]) 12:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Identifying and using primary sources: Difference between revisions