Revision as of 00:36, 5 June 2011 edit Yaris678 (talk \| contribs) Administrators 12,470 edits →Possible further phases: Further refs ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:37, 5 June 2011 edit undo Yaris678 (talk \| contribs) Administrators 12,470 edits m →Possible further phases: typo Next edit →
Line 40: A number of suggestions have been made for what to do next, either as an additional phase or in a new ___location. The suggestions include: Discuss the [[requirement]]s. What do people actually want from a tool like pending changes? Progress from that point in a logical fashion.<ref>[[Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment February 2011/Archive 1#Should we define our requirements first?]]</ref> A questionnaire. This would enable each user to express an opinion on set questions. The responses would be analysed by a panel of trusted editors, who would bring a proposal forward to the community.<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Pending_changes/Request_for_Comment_February_2011&direction=prev&oldid=419859535 Questionnaire posted briefly on the RfC page]</ref><ref>[[Wikipedia talk:Pending changes/Request for Comment February 2011/Archive 2#phase 3: what to ask.]]</ref> *Essays. Users would be encouraged to write essays, analysing the pending-changes situation.<ref>[[Wikipedia talk:Pending changes/Request for Comment February 2011/Archive 3#Ideas for what happens next]]</ref> They will use the space afforded by an essay to analyse evidence and construct logical arguments. It is anticipated that these would include: #Proposals for how PC should be done

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment February 2011: Difference between revisions