Revision as of 14:58, 8 June 2011 edit Heimstern (talk \| contribs) Administrators 16,892 edits →Yes, adopt the new updated policy: OK ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:12, 9 June 2011 edit undo Fifelfoo (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 13,802 edits →No, retain the old policy Next edit →
Line 343: ## The Committee has no business appointing checkusers and oversighters, and this responsibility should be devolved to the community as soon as possible. I do understand that there is no consensus for ''how'' to do so at this time, but it needs to be done. [[User:TotientDragooned\|TotientDragooned]] ([[User talk:TotientDragooned\|talk]]) 20:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC) # None of this will matter because it doesn't solve wiki's root problems.[[User:BarkingMoon\|BarkingMoon]] ([[User talk:BarkingMoon\|talk]]) 00:58, 7 June 2011 (UTC) # I have a principled opposition to this policy, relating to its construction of jusiprudence, jurisdiction, and governance. [[User:Fifelfoo\|Fifelfoo]] ([[User talk:Fifelfoo\|talk]]) 07:12, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy/Update and ratification: Difference between revisions