Revision as of 10:24, 19 June 2011 edit D is for... (talk \| contribs) 326 edits →June 2011 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:29, 19 June 2011 edit undo D is for... (talk \| contribs) 326 edits →June 2011 Next edit →
Line 46: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines\|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus\|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards\|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution\|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy\|page protection]]. If you continue edit warring, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked]] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[User:4twenty42o\|4twenty42o]] ([[User talk:4twenty42o\|talk]]) 07:24, 19 June 2011 (UTC) I am not engaging in any "war". What a terrible and tone-deaf choice of a term. AsI asurvived ~~survivor~~an ~~of a~~actual civil war. ~~that~~I am not criticizing you personally, since this seems to be a wiki term, but it is ~~downright~~tone deaf of wiki, nonetheless. ~~insulting!~~ I have already contacted the people who keep reverting sourced information onseeking to find consensus with them and understand their reasons, they have yet to reply. BTW: I assume you contacted the party who keeps deleting my sourced information as well? [[User:D is for...\|D is for...]] ([[User talk:D is for...#top\|talk]]) 10:24, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

D is for...