Revision as of 14:26, 20 June 2011 edit Msnicki (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 10,360 edits m →Learning Perl: that -> your ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:52, 21 June 2011 edit undo Jclemens (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 46,125 edits →Learning Perl: k Next edit →
Line 15: ::::: I fail to see why such a thing would be necessary? —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 14:19, 20 June 2011 (UTC) ::::: Conversely, I doubt you will be unable to convince other editors to add any language indicating citations from other book are not to be used to determine notability. —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 14:24, 20 June 2011 (UTC) *'''Keep''' The problem with NBOOK is that it's geared toward literature and fiction, not textbooks, which is what this is. It's the single best known textbook for a major programming language. Full disclosure--I own a copy and have met the author socially once. The citations mentioned above are really an appropriate measure of a textbook's worth--no one issues awards for technology textbooks, nor studies their authors, nor teaches classes on their influence on popular culture... you get the point. NBOOK criteria 2+ are essentially irrelevant to the entire field. [[User:Jclemens\|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens\|talk]]) 05:52, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learning Perl: Difference between revisions