Content deleted Content added
→GA Review: re |
Starstriker7 (talk | contribs) →Overall comments: Two comments left, I'm afraid. |
||
Line 57:
Excellent work. This is already a high quality article, and after the tweaks, should be all set for GA. Good work, Queenieacoustic! This was actually quite an interesting read to me. :) --'''[[User:Starstriker7|Starstriker7]]'''<sup>([[User talk:Starstriker7|Talk]])</sup> 01:44, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
:Wow, thanks! And thanks for the review, I'm pretty sure I've fixed all of its problems now. Thanks again! [[User:Queenieacoustic|Queenieacoustic]] ([[User talk:Queenieacoustic|talk]]) 20:15, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
::Of course. :)
::Everything you addressed was done well, but you actually missed two of my comments. All that's left is to cite the viewer statistic in the lead, and to say that the reviews were generally positive (the reviews you listed were ''largely'' positive, but some had quite a few problems with the episode). Sorry for the inconvenience, but after those last two, this will be set to go. --'''[[User:Starstriker7|Starstriker7]]'''<sup>([[User talk:Starstriker7|Talk]])</sup> 23:28, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
| |||