Content deleted Content added
m moved Talk:Scripts in Unicode to Talk:Script (Unicode): No reason for plural |
→Propose re-move to "Scripts in Unicode": new section |
||
Line 6:
I think that it is a bad idea to merge this article with [[Mapping of Unicode characters]]. It is useful to have a separate page that lists all of the Unicode scripts. [[User:BabelStone|BabelStone]] ([[User talk:BabelStone|talk]]) 13:03, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
== Propose re-move to "Scripts in Unicode" ==
In [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Script_%28Unicode%29&diff=424669083&oldid=424668466 this] edit, User:Wickey-nl changed the title into "Script (Unicode)", with es: ''... No reason for plural''. I object, and want to revert the move. First, if it was to take out the plural as the es says, it should be renamed "Script in Unicode", clearly. Still then, that does not describe correctly what the article is about. Second, the word "script" in Unicode is ''not redefined''. Unicode uses the definition of "script" as in [[Writing system]]. It is not redefined as if there exists a "Unicode script" or "Script (Unicode)". But the current name suggest a separate definition by Unicode. -[[User:DePiep|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep|talk]]) 08:40, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
| |||