Revision as of 19:34, 7 July 2011 edit Modernist (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 106,874 edits →Formal abstraction: delete ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:35, 7 July 2011 edit undo Modernist (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 106,874 edits →Formal abstraction: re Next edit →
Line 6: I had nominated this for speedy delete for copyvio. The offending text was removed and the speedy delete tag was removed leaving this mess. This is unsourced original research and is no longer even a complete article (not that it was good to begin with). If ''anything'' in this is worth keeping it can merged elsewhere. This is a theory by one art historian with little apparent traction elsewhere [[User:Freshacconci\|<b><FONT COLOR="#000000">freshacconci</FONT></b>]][[User talk:Freshacconci\|<b><FONT COLOR="#B22222"> talk</FONT><FONT COLOR="#2F4F4F">talk</FONT></b>]] 19:27, 7 July 2011 (UTC) :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Visual arts\|list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small><small>—[[User:Freshacconci\|<b><FONT COLOR="#000000">freshacconci</FONT></b>]][[User talk:Freshacconci\|<b><FONT COLOR="#B22222"> talk</FONT><FONT COLOR="#2F4F4F">talk</FONT></b>]] 19:28, 7 July 2011 (UTC)</small> *'''Delete''' Looks like an unnecessary, and redundant hypothesis and violation of [[WP:OR]]...[[User:Modernist\|Modernist]] ([[User talk:Modernist\|talk]]) 19:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formal abstraction: Difference between revisions