Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:14, 11 July 2011

Revision as of 22:01, 12 July 2011

Line 14:

*'''Delete''' - no assertion of notability, no independent references. (Restoring redirect would also be acceptable.) --[[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|<span class="gfSarekSig">SarekOfVulcan (talk)</span>]] 03:45, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''- No independent references and I think a case can be made that this is [[WP:Promotion]], as the article creator is associated with the business that created the language. I also think the lack of independent and reliable sources make it pretty clear that [[WP:N]] is not satisfied. Finally, changing the redirect without any sort of discussion was inappropriate, as [[WP:N]] of [[G-code]] is well established. For now, the redirect should be restored and the article deleted. Let some enthusiastic user of the G programming language write up a new article once it receives broader and more verifiable coverage. [[User:Sailing to Byzantium|Sailing to Byzantium]] ([[User talk:Sailing to Byzantium|talk]]) 15:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

** I have already stated that I have nothing to do with the company. I just heard about the language and decided to create an article. How that would associate me with the company is beyond me. What proof did you have to offer that I'm somehow a member of the company? [[User:Drquim|Drquim]] ([[User talk:Drquim|talk]]) 22:01, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 20:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)