Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sampling variogram: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) Relisting debate |
|||
Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}
:{{la|Sampling variogram}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sampling variogram|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 July
:({{Find sources|Sampling variogram}})
A non-self-contained article that requires multiple accesses to external pages to understand. Edit tags in place for several years without improvement. [[User:Melcombe|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe|talk]]) 09:06, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Line 13:
:::: Does non-appearance in OED mean it's a neologism when it's been in standard use in its field for a half-century or more? Maybe OED doesn't necessarily try to get into the technical terminology of every field, when it's quite obscure from the POV of people outside the field. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 03:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
:::Expertise isn't the issue here, POV is. If you look at geostatscam.com, you'll see the POV that geostatistics caused the Bre-X scandal. The same POV is being pushed at [[Sampling variogram]], but not at [[Variogram]]. —[[User:Hike395|hike395]] ([[User talk:Hike395|talk]]) 04:28, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:17, 15 July 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
<hr style="width:55%;" />
| |||