Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backup Multithreading: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
NatGertler (talk | contribs) |
Howartthou (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 17:
:--[[User:NatGertler|Nat Gertler]] ([[User talk:NatGertler|talk]]) 23:18, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
*'''Delete''': No evidence of notability. --[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:07, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Your point about "the New Your Times" is a bit harsh. You should consider this is a specialised subject and that relatively speaking there are not that many VB.NET students or professionals in the world. I agree the entry could be renamed '''Multithreading Backup Utility''' and the introduction/empahisis revised. But your point about "Notability" also seems harsh, again you must consider the audience for this subject matter is limited and while the article may provide a useful example and definition I get the impression that unless something is popular it just ain't good enough for wiki. Can't say I agree with your poiny around popularity a.k.a. "Notability".
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 19:21, 15 July 2011 (UTC)</small>
| |||