Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backup Multithreading: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 15:
:::::This is the opposite of what you claim it is --[[User:DeVerm|DeVerm]] ([[User talk:DeVerm|talk]]) 13:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC).
::::::??? I say "The article says that Hello World programs are used to explain the syntax", you show the article saying just that, and use that to claim that it's the opposite of what I say it is? --[[User:NatGertler|Nat Gertler]] ([[User talk:NatGertler|talk]]) 13:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
::::::: I'm out since I'm being told I disrupt Wikipedia by FuFu and we can't have that. --[[User:DeVerm|DeVerm]] ([[User talk:DeVerm|talk]]) 04:30, 17 July 2011 (UTC).
I find your point about the number of downloads quite irrelavent in that the article is a classic example of multithreading coding in VB.NET using Object Oriented Programming. If your focus is emperical then consider the article has been viewed nearly 81,000 times. It teaches "multithreading" in VB.NET. Just like "hello world" but more advanced teaching on multithreading and VB.NET. The article is the subject, the Backup program is the by-product. And like most good definitions the article and subject teaching separates itself from more classic examples by the fact that it is demonstratable with a useful program called "Backup". This is absolutely essential when defining and teaching a concept like multithreading, OOP and VB.NET. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Howartthou|Howartthou]] ([[User talk:Howartthou|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Howartthou|contribs]]) 22:50, 15 July 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:It seems there is a lack of clarity about what the subject of the Wikipedia article is supposed to be.
| |||