Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backup Multithreading: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Howartthou (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 31:
*'''Delete'''. No evidence it passes [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:DeVerm]] is known for making [[WP:POINT]]-violating votes, and is again going it here. He should probably be banned from wasting administrator's time, but in the mean time, he should just be ignored. [[User:FuFoFuEd|FuFoFuEd]] ([[User talk:FuFoFuEd|talk]]) 03:46, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
:* oh, that is nice of you; what happened to [[WP:AGF]]? Also, pls enlighten us all and show where my editing and/or WP involvement was ever brought to any board. My slate is clean my friend and it's you who should study [[WP:POINT]] again and stop your unwarranted personal attack. --[[User:DeVerm|DeVerm]] ([[User talk:DeVerm|talk]]) 04:24, 17 July 2011 (UTC).
lll
For what it is worth regarding notibility, if you read the forum comments in my article at the Code Project, it should be evident that my work has been used as a source to create similar backup software and is also likely to have been used a a template for threading using OOD. Unfortunately those "students" of my work are not likely to have published a reference to my work. It should be obvious however that the article itself is a learning aide and that the Code Project is actually referencing my work, which I published from my laptop to the code project web site. The code project in this context is the publisher...
[[User:howartthou|howartthou]]
| |||