Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backup Multithreading: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Howartthou (talk | contribs) |
Howartthou (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 42:
Oy Vey, since when did "conflict of interest" as a term become wikipedia specific?? And where is the notability of this new wikipedia specific term called "conflict of interest"? I am sure wikipedia is full of terms and definitions ("conflict of interest" being a perfect example of wikipedia itself inventing terms without notability. The article now meets wiki requirements better than many existing terms in wiki I am sure...I suspect you are being [[hypocritical]]. --[[User:Howartthou|Howartthou]] ([[User talk:Howartthou|talk]]) 22:44, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
:If there are other articles which you feel may be in violation of policies and guidelines, I recommend that you raise those issues on the talk pages of those articles. If you wish to make vague accusations against me, I suggest that you use my talk page; you will find a link to it at the end of this message. --[[User:NatGertler|Nat Gertler]] ([[User talk:NatGertler|talk]]) 22:54, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Well, i have yet to understand your discrimation against forums as a notable reference?? Come on, forums are where it's at in the modern world. They belong to scientific and engineering communuties in all sorts of areas as well as many other diciplines. A forum is an education tool, a valid literary reference, a library of works, probably more relevant than any paper publication because it's on the global village. These forums are educational and reference the article, thats notability. There are many other references to the article within the code project I have not listed. An internet medium as just another form of media, as so too are forums as part of that. So now as you imply, the references don't have enough prestiege?? By the way, I did not intend to make accusations against you, and if I did it is by want of a better choice of words. Everything I have said here I believe relevant to the definition in question. I don't think I need to be redirected to other areas of wiki. I am resonding here to this article, as per its purpose. I remain unconvinced regarding your notability point and do not wish to digress from the purpose of this "right of reply" to your proposal to delete his entry. --[[User:Howartthou|Howartthou]] ([[User talk:Howartthou|talk]]) 02:06, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
| |||