Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simplified swarm optimization: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Simplified swarm optimization: comment |
|||
Line 9:
*Either '''keep and clean up''', or '''merge''' to [[Particle swarm optimization]]. The optimization algorithm described in this article appears to be a simplification of the particle swarm optimization algorithm, so it might be worthwhile to cover this subject within the PSO article. Maybe the original author of this article should be notified of this discussion and given the chance to edit it to give it some context. In fact, the original author should have been notified, regardless. [[WP:IDONTUNDERSTANDIT]] isn't really a good deletion reason. --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] <sup>[[User talk:Elkman|(Elkspeak)]]</sup> 01:46, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
* '''Comment''' There are dozens of variants of PSO, most of them not very notable. I'll have to look closer into this on, but as [[WP:IDONTUNDERSTANDIT]] isn't a very good reason for deletion, it shouldn't be a very good reason to keep either. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 22:22, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as a non-notable variation of [[Particle swarm optimization]] (PSO). Of the 5 references, only one relates to the subject, and it's an unrefereed and uncited report. There has indeed also been a 2011 journal paper by Yeh, but it has not yet been cited at all, so there is no indication that this variation of PSO is notable. In addition, the term "Simplified Swarm Optimization" also appears in a number of publications by Noorhaniza Wahid, but in those cases it refers to a different method of the same name, which makes this a poor article title. -- [[Special:Contributions/202.124.74.243|202.124.74.243]] ([[User talk:202.124.74.243|talk]]) 06:47, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
| |||