Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simplified swarm optimization: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 11:
*'''Delete''' as a non-notable variation of [[Particle swarm optimization]] (PSO). Of the 5 references, only one relates to the subject, and it's an unrefereed and uncited report. There has indeed also been a 2011 journal paper by Yeh, but it has not yet been cited at all, so there is no indication that this variation of PSO is notable. In addition, the term "Simplified Swarm Optimization" also appears in a number of publications by Noorhaniza Wahid, but in those cases it refers to a different method of the same name, which makes this a poor article title. -- [[Special:Contributions/202.124.74.243|202.124.74.243]] ([[User talk:202.124.74.243|talk]]) 06:47, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
:* Would the IP care to elaborate on these (incorrect afaik) statements? You first say that only one of the 5 references relates to the subject, only to follow up explaining that others are also related but you don't like them?! I just read through the linked reference from Kennedy and Eberhart and it is about this article, no matter how they call it (mostly "simplified version" etc.) Also, I do not follow your requirements for reports... it sounds like you only accept reports from scientists when they have references for their findings? Would be history instead of science imho. --[[User:DeVerm|DeVerm]] ([[User talk:DeVerm|talk]]) 15:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC).
| |||