Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simplified swarm optimization: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) Relisting debate |
|||
Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}
:{{la|Simplified swarm optimization}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simplified swarm optimization|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 July
:({{Find sources|Simplified swarm optimization}})
I was tempted to tag this for speedy as "no context" but I believe it is something in computer science. No attempt made to demonstrate notability. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] {{toolbar|separator=dot|[[::User talk:RHaworth|talk]] | [[::Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]] }} 10:16, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Line 12:
*'''Delete''' as a non-notable variation of [[Particle swarm optimization]] (PSO). Of the 5 references, only one relates to the subject, and it's an unrefereed and uncited report. There has indeed also been a 2011 journal paper by Yeh, but it has not yet been cited at all, so there is no indication that this variation of PSO is notable. In addition, the term "Simplified Swarm Optimization" also appears in a number of publications by Noorhaniza Wahid, but in those cases it refers to a different method of the same name, which makes this a poor article title. -- [[Special:Contributions/202.124.74.243|202.124.74.243]] ([[User talk:202.124.74.243|talk]]) 06:47, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
:* Would the IP care to elaborate on these (incorrect afaik) statements? You first say that only one of the 5 references relates to the subject, only to follow up explaining that others are also related but you don't like them?! I just read through the linked reference from Kennedy and Eberhart and it is about this article, no matter how they call it (mostly "simplified version" etc.) Also, I do not follow your requirements for reports... it sounds like you only accept reports from scientists when they have references for their findings? Would be history instead of science imho. --[[User:DeVerm|DeVerm]] ([[User talk:DeVerm|talk]]) 15:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC).
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:03, 25 July 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
<hr style="width:55%;" />
| |||