Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 10:
In [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Script_%28Unicode%29&diff=424669083&oldid=424668466 this] edit, User:Wickey-nl changed the title into "Script (Unicode)", with es: ''... No reason for plural''. I object, and want to revert the move. First, if it was to take out the plural as the es says, it should be renamed "Script in Unicode", clearly. Still then, that does not describe correctly what the article is about. Second, the word "script" in Unicode is ''not redefined''. Unicode uses the definition of "script" as in [[Writing system]]. It is not redefined as if there exists a "Unicode script" or "Script (Unicode)". But the current name suggest a separate definition by Unicode. -[[User:DePiep|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep|talk]]) 08:40, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
:When I look at the title "Script (Unicode)", I think the breadth of the article, as well as the interest, is increased. It suggests an article that deals with the concept of what constitutes a script in Unicode, how Unicode identifies and uses the concept of a script, and so forth. "Script in Unicode" seems like it is talking about a technical property, where "Scripts in Unicode" sounds like a list. While the definition and use of the "script" property certainly belongs in "Script (Unicode)", I don't think some of the more interesting content about how Unicode defines and understands scripts would really belong in an article titled "Script in Unicode". Just my thought. I would also support "Scripts (Unicode)", but I can see why others would balk at it. [[User:Vanisaac|VI]]<sub>[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Writing systems|WS]]</sub> <sup>[[User talk:Vanisaac|talk]]</sup> 04:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
| |||