Drug Interventions Programme: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:23, 31 July 2011

Revision as of 11:25, 31 July 2011

Line 75:

| format = pdf

| doi =

| accessdate = 30th July 2011 }}</ref>.

| accessdate = 30th July 2011 }}</ref>. Some evidence has been taken to suggest that DIP has been effective in achieving its aims. A severe shortfall of methodologically rigorous evaluations makes it impossible to ascertain DIP's true impact on levels of acquisitive crime, though in his foreword to the 2008 Drug Strategy the Home Secretary claimed that DIP coercion and case management have 'contributed to a fall in recorded acquisitive crime of around 20 per cent'<ref>{{cite web

| accessdate = 30th July 2011 }}</ref>. Some evidence has been taken to suggest that DIP has been effective in achieving its aims., Athough severea serious shortfall ofin methodologically rigorous evaluations makes itsuch impossibleclaims toproblematic. ascertain DIP's true impact on levels of acquisitive crimeNonetheless, though in his foreword to the 2008 Drug Strategy the Home Secretary claimed that DIP coercion and case management have 'contributed to a fall in recorded acquisitive crime of around 20 per cent'<ref>{{cite web

| last = Home Office

| first =