Revision as of 19:47, 31 July 2011 edit Kirill Lokshin (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 75,365 edits →Involved administrators ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:30, 31 July 2011 edit undo Newyorkbrad (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 45,896 edits →Rd232: question Next edit →
Line 219: :# Amending in light of recent developments. [[User:Jclemens\|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens\|talk]]) 05:17, 31 July 2011 (UTC) :#  [[User:Roger Davies\|<span style="color:maroon; font-variant:small-caps">'''Roger Davies'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies\|'''talk''']]</sup> 19:00, 31 July 2011 (UTC) :#:To those changing from oppose to support on this finding based on the recent block—isn't that covered by 3.1, so that supporting this as well would be double-counting? Or put differently, the block may not have been proper (see principle 5), but was it really for a "questionable purpose"? [[User:Newyorkbrad\|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad\|talk]]) 20:30, 31 July 2011 (UTC) :Oppose:

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/MickMacNee/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions