Revision as of 16:51, 13 August 2011 edit Fluffernutter (talk \| contribs) Administrators 41,742 edits →Questions for the candidate: +1 answer, working on other ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:05, 13 August 2011 edit undo Fluffernutter (talk \| contribs) Administrators 41,742 edits →Support: preview is both a friend and an enemy Next edit →
Line 115: #'''Support''' — No concerns. [[User:EdJohnston\|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston\|talk]]) 15:13, 13 August 2011 (UTC) #'''Support''' <small>I was concerned that the stats on this RfA's talk page showed so few pages extensively edited, and the [[Whoopi Goldberg]] edits seemed all to be reverts and two minor moves. However, the user page displays some serious content contributions. Why don't they appear on the page stats?</small> Good editor with good content contributions. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz\|<font style="color:blue;background:yellow;"> '''Kiefer'''</font>]].[[User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz#top\|Wolfowitz]]</span></small> 16:50, 13 August 2011 (UTC) #:<small>Probably because I preview a lot in my big edits, so a whole article copyedit or rewrite would tend to show up as 1-3 edits, while vandalism reversion is one edit at a time that adds up over years. Stupid good-watchlist-hygiene, minimizing mah stats! [[User:Fluffernutter\|A fluffernutter is a sandwich!]] ([[User talk:Fluffernutter\|talk]]) 17:05, 13 August 2011 (UTC)</small> =====Oppose=====

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fluffernutter: Difference between revisions