Revision as of 02:47, 15 August 2011 edit Jojalozzo (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 23,627 edits m →Is Program Evaluation and Review Technique a proper name?: fmt ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:14, 15 August 2011 edit undo Jojalozzo (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 23,627 edits →Is Program Evaluation and Review Technique a proper name?: invite to discussion at village pump Next edit →
Line 85: ::Also, Program Evaluation and Review Technique is capitalized in a reference to it in [http://www.google.com/patents?id=krNpAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4#v=onepage&q&f=false U.S. patent no.3124885].[[User:Lindsay658\|Lindsay658]] ([[User talk:Lindsay658\|talk]]) 23:43, 14 August 2011 (UTC) :::Wikipedia capitalization is governed by its own rules: summed up as "[[WP:MOSCAPS\|avoid unnecessary capitalization]]". Usage in patents or in the industry does not change this. <font color="#500000">[[User:Jojalozzo\|Joja]]</font><font color="#005000">[[User talk:Jojalozzo\|lozzo]]</font> 02:45, 15 August 2011 (UTC) I started a discussion of the general topic of naming ideas in engineering at the [[WP:VPP#When are names for technical methods and systems proper names and when are they not?\|Village pump]]. <font color="#500000">[[User:Jojalozzo\|Joja]]</font><font color="#005000">[[User talk:Jojalozzo\|lozzo]]</font> 16:14, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Program evaluation and review technique: Difference between revisions