Revision as of 20:57, 17 July 2011 edit WhatamIdoing (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 128,607 edits →You are allowed to use primary sources... carefully: Corporate website ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:54, 15 August 2011 edit undo WhatamIdoing (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 128,607 edits →"Secondary" is not another way to spell "good": Link Next edit →
Line 53: =="Secondary" is not another way to spell "good"== {{See\|Wikipedia:Secondary does not mean independent}} "Secondary" is not, and should not be, a bit of jargon used by Wikipedians to mean "good" or "reliable" or "usable". Secondary '''does not''' mean that the source is [[WP:INDY\|independent]], authoritative, high-quality, accurate, fact-checked, expert-approved, subject to editorial control, or published by a reputable publisher. Secondary sources can be unreliable, biased, [[conflict of interest\|self-serving]] and [[wikt:self-publishing\|self-published]].

Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources: Difference between revisions