Content deleted Content added
m →Notability: minor wordsmithing |
m →Notability: typo |
||
Line 9:
The second one (Future Information Technology, Part I: 6th International Conference) is better. It [http://www.amazon.com/Future-Information-Technology-International-Conference/dp/3642223087 hasn't been released yet] but after searching, I found it [http://www.worldcat.org/title/future-information-technology-6th-international-conference-futuretech-2011-loutraki-greece-june-28-30-2011-proceedings-part-i/oclc/743288033?title=&detail=&page=frame&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1007%2F978-3-642-22333-4%26checksum%3D2f368965a4018fb8f195284f641951bd&linktype=digitalObject online]; I'll update the reference in the article. And as a primary source, the sourceforge link is useless for establishing notability. I would prefer to see a second good source.
I'm also concerned that the article appears to largely
|