Content deleted Content added
m Subst: {{unsigned}} (& regularise templates) |
Ngoclong19 (talk | contribs) ... |
||
Line 148:
I just removed a section titled "Load average is not CPU utilization" added by [[User:Sp0|Sp0]] a few months ago. The text of the section was:
: Even though the statements in the previous section might suggest that load average is related to CPU utilization because the section relates CPU to load average, load average does not measure CPU utilization of processes. One reason it does not do this is because load averages computations of processes are in a wrong order to relate to trend information of CPU utilization. In other words, the calculations and numbers directly produced by load averages do not compute numbers in an order from more CPU intensive to less CPU intensive or vice versa, nor do they give computations of numbers that would give another way that would result in direct information about CPU utilization. In summary, the functions of load average give numbers based on load queue of processes.
Without making any comment on the accuracy of this information, there are two severe problems with this: First, it is almost completely incomprehensible due to grammatical errors and a generally rambling style. Second, the section existed to contradict the rest of the article. Sp0, if you believe the article is factually inaccurate, the correct response is to edit or replace the existing text to make it accurate, and preferably also to include citations of reliable sources to prevent an edit war. -- [[User:Tyler McHenry|Tyler]] ([[User talk:Tyler McHenry|talk]]) 18:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
|