Wikipedia:Featured article candidates: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
David Gerard (talk | contribs) →(Contested -- Jul 1) [[Lawrence_v._Texas]]: the lawyer pic? |
|||
Line 39:
* Object. My only real concern is that 5 out of the 6 images in the article don't have source information. Other than that, seems like a nice article. [[User:Blankfaze|blankfaze]] | [http://www.livejournal.com/users/blankfaze ••] | [[User talk:blankfaze|••]] 12:17, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
*Object. This is a potentially controversial topic and needs a considerable degree of NPOVing. [[User:Everyking|Everyking]] 16:08, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
**Agree with Everyking. [[User:172|172]] 16:55, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
* Object. I find the naming of the article awkward. The article is one in a series of the history of Poland, not one about the People's Republic of Poland. That article should be more like the [[Soviet Union]] article. This one could do well as "History of the PR of Poland", or something fitting better in the "History of Poland" series. Also, a "section awaiting development" doesn't belong in a FA. [[User:Jeronimo|Jeronimo]] 16:46, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
| |||