Revision as of 16:22, 23 February 2010 edit JRSpriggs (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 18,932 edits maths rating		Revision as of 03:22, 31 August 2011 edit undo TricksterWolf (talk \| contribs) 483 edits →Limit Ordinal Definition: new section Next edit →
Line 1: {{maths rating\|class=Start\|priority=Low\|field=foundations}} == Limit Ordinal Definition == Again, by [[WP:BRD]], I'm reverting [[User:JRSpriggs]] who seems intent on reverting any of my edits on the topic of limit ordinals. Please discuss the issue here and achieve consensus according to policy prior to reverting my edits again. My position, as stated on the talk page for [[Normal function]], is that there exist several current texts defining 0 as a limit ordinal. This being the case, a small change in wording which provides a correct definition for either case is, I believe, preferable. [[User:TricksterWolf\|TricksterWolf]] ([[User talk:TricksterWolf\|talk]]) 03:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Fixed-point lemma for normal functions: Difference between revisions