Fixed-point lemma for normal functions: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Background and formal statement: avoid implying that zero is a limit
Undid revision 444557017 by JRSpriggs (talk) Please follow WP:BRD and discuss before editing so we can achieve consensus; I'm sure there is a solution that satisfies us both.
Line 1:
{{Need-Consensus}}
 
The '''fixed-point lemma for normal functions''' is a basic result in [[axiomatic set theory]] stating that any [[normal function]] has arbitrarily large [[fixed point (mathematics)|fixed point]]s (Levy 1979: p. 117). It was first proved by [[Oswald Veblen]] in 1908.
 
Line 4 ⟶ 6:
A [[normal function]] is a [[proper class|class]] function ''f'' from the class Ord of [[ordinal numbers]] to itself such that:
* ''f'' is '''strictly increasing''': ''f''(&alpha;) < f(&beta;) whenever &alpha; < &beta;.
* ''f'' is '''continuous''': for every nonzero limit ordinal &lambda; (i.e. &lambda; is neither zero nor a successor), ''f''(&lambda;) = sup { f(&alpha;) : &alpha; < &lambda; }.
It can be shown that if ''f'' is normal then ''f'' commutes with [[supremum|suprema]]; for any nonempty set ''A'' of ordinals,
:''f''(sup ''A'') = sup {''f''(&alpha;) : &alpha; ∈ ''A'' }.