Revision as of 00:09, 6 September 2011 edit Gene93k (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 468,367 edits m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Albums and songs ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:42, 6 September 2011 edit undo Peridon (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 43,650 edits →Command test record Next edit →
Line 6: No assertion of notability. There are several kinds of such LPs--I don't see how or why this one is special. Anything that is really relevant (and can be sourced) could be included in [[LP album]] or [[Command Records]] or somesuch. I just don't see this particular product meriting its own article. —[[User:Koavf\|Justin (koavf)]]❤[[User talk:Koavf\|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf\|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf\|M]]☯ 18:18, 5 September 2011 (UTC) :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Albums and songs\|list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 00:09, 6 September 2011 (UTC)</small> *'''Comment''' These records were a thing of their day, and there might be a case for an article on them in general, discussing the different approaches used. <small>(Not volunteering...)</small> I can't see much case for an article on just one brand's product. I did decline a speedy, on the grounds that the red-linked performer criterion probably couldn't apply to a record of tones and anonymous feet crossing a wooden floored room from left to right, and then back again (assuming that's on this one). The performers on the B side are notable, but they are just there as fill up and promo. [[User:Peridon\|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon\|talk]]) 12:42, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Command test record: Difference between revisions