Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 73:
US military helicopter losses to MANPAD systems prompted Army Aviation to field the BAE Systems AAR-57 Common Missile Warning System (CMWS), to locate incoming missiles accurately. The Navy is continuing development of JATAS to integrate Missile Warning Receiver, Hostile Fire Indicator and Laser Warning Receiver functions. MOSA interfaces will make it possible for CIRCM to take cues from either warning system. It is important for reasons of expediency and cost that when a CIRCM system is chosen and fielded on US aircraft, it is backward compatible with CMWS, and forward compatible with JATAS, according to Army Lt. Col. Raymond Pickering, product manager for infrared countermeasures at the Program Executive Office-Intelligence, Electronic Warfare and Sensors ([[PEO IEWS]]).<ref>{{cite web|last=Colucci|first=Frank|title=Common Countermeasures|url=http://www.aviationtoday.com/av/issue/feature/Common-Countermeasures_71251.html|publisher=Avionics Magazine Online|accessdate=29 August 2011}}</ref>
The program is currently in the technology maturation phase, and all competitors will be emphasizing the reliability and adherence of their systems to the modular open system architecture, which has prompted bidders to seek a competitive edge over and above the requirements of the DoD.<ref>{{cite web|last=Trimble|first=Stephen|title=CIRCM bidders consider ways to dazzle US Army budgeters|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2011/07/21/359718/circm-bidders-consider-ways-to-dazzle-us-army-budgeters.html|publisher=FlightGlobal.com|accessdate=2 September 2011}}</ref>[[File:ITT CIRCM System.jpg|thumb|The complete, unmounted CIRCM System, including laser, pointer-tracker and fibre optic coupling, developed by ITT]]
ITT, for example, has been developing a CIRCM system that has now reached a [[technology readiness level]] (TRL) of 6 (demonstrated level of readiness) which includes functionality to address the threats posed by low-tech and ubiquitous unguided projectiles such as bullets and rocket-propelled grenades ([[Rocket-propelled grenade|RPGs]]). This would work by employing an additional visible, non-lethal laser that could be directed at the source of the small-arms or RPG fire, dazzling enemy forces and making it impossible for them to look directly at their target.<ref>{{cite web|title=New Laser Countermeasures Could Defeat RPGs|url=http://defensetech.org/2011/07/08/new-laser-countermeasures-could-defeat-rpgs/|publisher=DefenseTech.org|accessdate=2 September 2011}}</ref>[[File:ITT CIRCM System.jpg|thumb|The complete, unmounted CIRCM System, developed by ITT]]▼
▲ITT, for example, has been developing a CIRCM system that has now reached a [[technology readiness level]] (TRL) of 6 (demonstrated level of readiness) which includes functionality to address the threats posed by low-tech and ubiquitous unguided projectiles such as bullets and rocket-propelled grenades ([[Rocket-propelled grenade|RPGs]]). This would work by employing an additional visible, non-lethal laser that could be directed at the source of the small-arms or RPG fire, dazzling enemy forces and making it impossible for them to look directly at their target.<ref>{{cite web|title=New Laser Countermeasures Could Defeat RPGs|url=http://defensetech.org/2011/07/08/new-laser-countermeasures-could-defeat-rpgs/|publisher=DefenseTech.org|accessdate=2 September 2011}}</ref>
Such additional functionalities will likely be important in the military’s decision to award the CIRCM contract, particularly in light of the persistent threat of low-tech small arms fire (including RPGs), which are not, addressed in the majority of advanced technology IRCM systems.
| |||