Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2011/May: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →{{Cl|Australian port stubs}}: closing |
m →split of {{cl|Quebec MP stubs}}: closing |
||
Line 45:
===split of {{cl|Quebec MP stubs}}===
{{sfp create|create by party}}
Oversized and with at least two ways to split based on other precedants I'll offer both up and see which we prefer. Either a split by dob
*{{Tl|Quebec-MP-1940s-stub}} - {{Cl|Quebec MPs, 1940s birth stubs}} etc
Line 55 ⟶ 56:
Discuss! [[User:Waacstats|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats|talk]]) 10:22, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
:My own tendency would be to '''support''' the second one. I think by-party stubbing tends to make more sense due to the manner in which it winnows down the number of stubs available. --<font face="Old English Text MT">[[User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|Ser Amantio di Nicolao]]</font><sup>[[User_talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|''Che dicono a Signa?'']]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ser Amantio di Nicolao|'''Lo dicono a Signa.''']]</sub> 14:20, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
{{sfp bottom}}
==={{Cl|Australian port stubs}}===
|