Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2011 CUOS appointments/CU/Courcelles: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Questions for this candidate: +questions |
Courcelles (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 25:
=====Questions for this candidate=====
Being a checkuser, would you be willing to continue to help with the Checkuser backlog at [[WP:ACC]] as there are usually up to 6 requests waiting about 5 days+? -- [[User:DeltaQuad|<font color="green">DQ]][[User_Talk:DeltaQuad|<font color="red"> (t) ]] <font color="blue">[[Special:EmailUser/DeltaQuad| (e)]]</font></font></font> 19:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
: '''A:''' I'm never great at remembering to check ACC, but I think I've been willing to take a look every time someone has poked me that there was work needed there. I'm around on IRC, and there's a backlog, just poke me, and I'll come take a look. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 21:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Would you be proactive in looking at the open cases at SPI to see if they could use a checkuser after your term ends on AUSC? -- [[User:DeltaQuad|<font color="green">DQ]][[User_Talk:DeltaQuad|<font color="red"> (t) ]] <font color="blue">[[Special:EmailUser/DeltaQuad| (e)]]</font></font></font> 19:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
: '''A:''' Of course. The clerk system is a great one at workflow management, but CU's are, and should be, looking at other cases on the SPI page to see if their services would be useful. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 21:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
=====Comments=====
| |||