Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2011 CUOS appointments/CU/Courcelles: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments: + |
m →Comments: formatting |
||
Line 50:
:''Comments may also be submitted to the Arbitration Committee privately by emailing {{NoSpam|arbcom-en-b|lists.wikimedia.org}}''
*In my limited observations of Courcelles I have found him to be an articulate and good faith editor with the significant authorities that he has on WP, so I support him continuing in CU and OS. [[User:Pine|<font color="#01796F"><b>Pine</b></font>]][[User talk:Pine|<sup>talk</sup>]] 19:43, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
*Courcelles is a well seasoned member of the AUSC and I would fully support for turning in the audit flag (or keeping it for that matter) for the CU flag. -- [[User:DeltaQuad|<font color="green">DQ]][[User_Talk:DeltaQuad|<font color="red"> (t) ]] <font color="blue">[[Special:EmailUser/DeltaQuad| (e)]]</font></font></font> 17:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
*Courcelles strikes me as both neutral and transparent in their actions. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 12:46, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
| |||