Revision as of 10:12, 5 October 2011 edit 193.127.207.152 (talk) →Proper fine grained locking: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:13, 5 October 2011 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,739 edits m Signing comment by 193.127.207.152 - "→Proper fine grained locking: new section" Next edit →
Line 252: It seems like [[Oracle Database]] has proper fine grained locking while [[Microsoft SQL Server]] does not. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1437200/sqlserver-2005-deadlock-problem-with-no-shared-records Would someone help me filling what databases have proper fine grained locking? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/193.127.207.152\|193.127.207.152]] ([[User talk:193.127.207.152\|talk]]) 10:12, 5 October 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Talk:Comparison of relational database management systems: Difference between revisions