Talk:Comparison of relational database management systems: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 193.127.207.152 - "Proper fine grained locking: new section"
I would only remove truly obsolete databases. But I would not change the alphabetical ordering.
Line 223:
 
:: I would remove most of them but I don't think that's a good idea. IMHO we should take the big ones, put them on top (Oracle,DB2,MSSQL,MySQL,PostgreSQL,Sybase,H or SQLlite and maybe one or two more) and then let the rest of the information rot on the bottom of the page xD[[User:Yourbane|Yourbane]] ([[User talk:Yourbane|talk]]) 10:41, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 
::: I would only remove truly obsolete databases. But I would not change the alphabetical ordering.
 
== Limits Max Index Length ==