Revision as of 10:28, 5 October 2011 edit 193.127.207.152 (talk) I would only remove truly obsolete databases. But I would not change the alphabetical ordering. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:29, 5 October 2011 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,737 edits m Signing comment by 193.127.207.152 - "I would only remove truly obsolete databases. But I would not change the alphabetical ordering." Next edit →
Line 224: :: I would remove most of them but I don't think that's a good idea. IMHO we should take the big ones, put them on top (Oracle,DB2,MSSQL,MySQL,PostgreSQL,Sybase,H or SQLlite and maybe one or two more) and then let the rest of the information rot on the bottom of the page xD[[User:Yourbane\|Yourbane]] ([[User talk:Yourbane\|talk]]) 10:41, 23 August 2011 (UTC) ::: I would only remove truly obsolete databases. But I would not change the alphabetical ordering. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/193.127.207.152\|193.127.207.152]] ([[User talk:193.127.207.152\|talk]]) 10:28, 5 October 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> == Limits Max Index Length ==

Talk:Comparison of relational database management systems: Difference between revisions