Content deleted Content added
link Sepp Hochreiter using Find link |
m [Pu408]Add: pmc. Tweak: title. You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. |
||
Line 5:
==Creating raw data==
Most microarray manufacturers, such as [[Affymetrix]] and [[Agilent]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.chem.agilent.com/Scripts/PCol.asp?lPage=494 |title=Agilent
==Background correction==
Depending on the type of array, signal related to nonspecific binding of the fluorophore can be subtracted to achieve better results. One approach involves subtracting the average
signal intensity of the area between spots. A variety of tools for background correction and further analysis are available from TIGR,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tigr.org/software/microarray.shtml |title=J. Craig Venter Institute -- Software |accessdate=2008-01-01 |format= |work=}}</ref> Agilent ([[GeneSpring]]),<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.chem.agilent.com/scripts/pds.asp?lpage=27881 |title=Agilent
==Quality control==
Line 20:
Comparing two different arrays, or two different samples hybridized to the same array generally involves making adjustments for systematic errors introduced by differences in procedures and dye intensity effects. Dye normalization for two color arrays is often achieved by [[local regression]]. LIMMA provides a set of tools for background correction and scaling, as well an option to average on-slide duplicate spots.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/limma/ |title=LIMMA Library: Linear Models for Microarray Data |accessdate=2008-01-01 |format= |work=}}</ref>. A common method for evaluating how well normalized an array is, is to plot an [[MA plot]] of the data.
Raw Affy data contains about twenty probes for the same RNA target. Half of these are "mismatch spots", which do not precisely match the target sequence. These can theoretically measure the amount of nonspecific binding for a given target. Robust Multichip Average (RMA) is a normalization approach that does not take advantage of these mismatch spots, but still must summarize the perfect matches through [[median polish]].<ref>{{cite journal |author=Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA, Astrand M, Speed TP |title=A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias |journal=Bioinformatics |volume=19 |issue=2 |pages=185–93 |year=2003 |pmid=12538238 |doi=10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.185}}</ref> The median polish algorithm, although robust, behaves differently depending on the number of samples analyzed.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Giorgi FM, Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B |title=Algorithm-driven
The current Affymetrix MAS5 algorithm, which uses both perfect match and mismatch probes, continues to enjoy popularity and do well in head to head tests.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Lim WK, Wang K, Lefebvre C, Califano A |title=Comparative analysis of microarray normalization procedures: effects on reverse engineering gene networks |journal=Bioinformatics |volume=23 |issue=13 |pages=i282–8 |year=2007 |pmid=17646307 |doi=10.1093/bioinformatics/btm201}}</ref>
Factor Analysis for Robust Microarray Summarization (FARMS)<ref>[[Sepp Hochreiter]], Djork-Arné Clevert, and Klaus Obermayer, 2006. A new summarization method for affymetrix probe level data. Bioinformatics, 22(8), 943-949. [http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/22/8/943]</ref> is a model-based technique for summarizing array data at perfect match probe level. It is based on a factor analysis model for which a Bayesian maximum a posteriori method optimizes the model parameters under the assumption of Gaussian measurement noise. According to the Affycomp benchmark<ref>http://affycomp.jhsph.edu/
==Identification of significant differential expression==
Line 32:
Commercial systems for gene network analysis such as Ingenuity<ref> {{cite web |url=http://www.ingenuity.com/ |title=Ingenuity Systems |accessdate=2007-12-31 |format= |work=}} </ref> and Pathway studio<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ariadnegenomics.com/products/pathway-studio/ |title=Ariadne Genomics: Pathway Studio |accessdate=2007-12-31 |format= |work=}}</ref> create visual representations of differentially expressed genes based on current scientific literature. Non-commercial tools such as [[GenMAPP]] also aid in organizing and visualizing gene network data procured from one or several microarray experiments. A wide variety of microarray analysis tools are available through [[Bioconductor]] written in the [[R programming language]]. The frequently cited SAM Excel module and other microarray tools<ref>[{{cite web |url=http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/SAM/ |title=Significance Analysis of Microarrays |accessdate=2007-12-31 |format= |work=}}]</ref> are available through Stanford University. Another set is available from Harvard and MIT<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.broad.mit.edu/tools/software.html |title=Software - Broad |accessdate=2007-12-31 |format= |work=}}</ref>.
Specialized software tools for statistical analysis to determine the extent of over- or under-expression of a gene in a microarray experiment relative to a reference state have also been developed to aid in identifying genes or gene sets associated with particular [[phenotype]]s. One such method of analysis, known as Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), uses a [[Kolmogorov-Smirnov]]-style statistic to identify groups of genes that are regulated together<ref>{{cite journal |author=Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, ''et al.'' |title=Gene set enrichment analysis:
==References==
|