Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 107:
:: Finally, I don't think we need a separate R6RS article (too many common themes), but a section devoted to each standard would be good. Such section can say something about how and when it was accepted, and then list everything that does not fit "Distinguishing features". As a bonus, we'll be able to wikify all the "[[R5RS]]" across the Wikipedia to point to the relevant section, not the generic Scheme article.
:: -- [[User:MagV|MagV]] ([[User talk:MagV|talk]]) 15:17, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
-- Easiest to implement --
Theres a statement in the wording that SCHEME is the easiest language of comparable power to implement. Is this REALLY true? I've seen some DAMN slim versions of Forth, and although its a pretty stacky sort of language, it was always a pretty expressive language and surprisingly capable for the kind of metaprogramming the lisps where known for.
| |||