Revision as of 19:40, 2 September 2011 edit WilliamSommerwerck (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,298 edits →Trying to understand the first sentence of the article. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:58, 26 October 2011 edit undo GimliDotNet (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 14,037 edits →Cut down examples: new section Next edit →
Line 142: In short... it's BOR...ing. I quit after the first two paragraphs. It needs not only a complete rewrite, but a complete re-conceptualization. [[User:WilliamSommerwerck\|WilliamSommerwerck]] ([[User talk:WilliamSommerwerck\|talk]]) 19:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC) == Cut down examples == Restored the examples, but then removed all but two. The ones I've chosen are C++ and Java, purely because this will cover a wide range of users, JavaScript is not OO and therefore is not a suitable example for this article, and Java/C/C# users should all be able to interpret the Java example quite easily. [[User:Carl Sixsmith\|Carl Sixsmith]] ([[User talk:Carl Sixsmith\|talk]]) 07:58, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Polymorphism in object-oriented programming: Difference between revisions