Revision as of 03:19, 28 October 2011 edit John Nowak (talk \| contribs) 223 edits Added references to examples of languages that do not use stacks ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:22, 28 October 2011 edit undo John Nowak (talk \| contribs) 223 edits Cleaned up talk about Cat as a typed language Next edit →
Line 20: Most existing concatenative languages are [[stack-based]]; this is not a requirement and other models have been proposed.<ref>[http://www.nsl.com/k/xy/xy.htm The Concatenative Language XY]</ref><ref>[http://www.enchiladacode.nl/ The Enchilada Programming Language]</ref> Concatenative languages are currently used for [[embedded systems\|embedded]], [[Application software\|desktop]], and [[web programming]], as [[target language]]s, and for research purposes. Most concatenative languages are [[dynamically typed]]. One exception is the [[statically typed]] [[Cat ~~(programming~~ language~~)\|Cat]] language which uses [[row polymorphism]] to assign types to functions that operate on stacks~~.<ref>[http://www.cat-language.com/manual.html Cat Specification]</ref> ==See also==

Concatenative programming language: Difference between revisions