Talk:Ada (programming language): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 483:
 
:Much of the discussion above is pretty funny in a weird kind of way - I find this symptomatic in software kind of articles on Wikipedia, I got some blatant lie reinserted some time ago for the reason that a subclause in my change note could be interpreted in the wrong way - other articles that are notoriously usually unreliable and [[WP:OR]] and unduly [[WP:SYNTH]]etic are religious and nationality articles. If you feel for it, remove Smalltalk, it's certainly from someones imagination, and if you're lucky, you won't be attacked from an ignorant moron. [[User:Rursus|Rursus]] dixit. ([[User talk:Rursus|<span style="color: red; background: #FFFF80"><sup>m</sup><u>bork<sup>3</sup></u></span>]]!) 19:01, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 
:: I will note that Rursus was equally certain that Ada95 wasn't influenced by Java.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] ([[User talk:Prosfilaes|talk]]) 06:08, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 
== Nice link ==